James, son of Alphaeus, an Apostle (9th in a series on the Apostles)

In describing the newly nominated Supreme Court Justice, David Souter—President George H.W. Bush’s nominee to fill the vacancy created by Justice William Brennan’s resignation in 1990—one commentator described the New Hampshire nominee as a “blank page.” By that, he meant that Souter was virtually unknown. He had not written many decisions on matters of national significance and thus had not left a “paper trail.”

That’s about how one might describe the subject of this installment in this series on the apostles of our Lord. James, the son of Alphaeus—compared with the other apostles—is sort of a blank page.

His name is mentioned only in the three New Testament synoptic gospels, where the apostles are listed, and possibly in Mark 15:40—where “Mary, the mother of James, the less” is mentioned. The “less” may mean that he was short in stature, or of modest influence, or of a “retiring” personality—if indeed this person whose mother is mentioned as being at Calvary with Mary Magdalene and Salome—was James, the apostle.

There is some conjecture about him. For instance, Matthew the apostle is also said to be the son of Alphaeus in Mark 2:14. It may be, then, that Matthew and this James, both called the son of Alphaeus, were brothers. They are never called brothers, however, so each may simply have had a father named Alphaeus. Also, some have thought this James to have been one of the brothers of Jesus who wrote the epistle of James. But, since the brothers of Jesus were spoken of in John 7 as unbelievers, initially at least, this in an unlikely possibility.

Interestingly, though very little is said of James in Scripture, his life can be inspiring! I believe every one of us can be and should be encouraged by the life of James, the son of Alphaeus, because we can all be—like him—what God wants us to be: 

  1. He was a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ, Matt. 10:1ff. He did what his Lord equipped him to do:

► He preached the gospel of the kingdom, v. 7

► He did some great things in Christ’s name: (Matt. 10:1ff.; 2 Cor. 12:12)

  • Healed the sick, v. 8
  • Cleansed lepers, v. 8
  • Raised the dead, v.8
  • Cast out devils, v.8

► He was persecuted, v. 22

► He was, above all things, a servant, v. 25

  1. He was a faithful and obedient servant of Jesus Christ. (Acts 1:13)

► He wrote no epistles (like Paul)

► He preached no classic sermons (like Peter)

► He founded no church that we know of, nor did he pastor any great church

► But he was what Christ expects every follower to be:

  • Faithful in all things, even that which is least
  • Faithful unto death. Believers will be rewarded at the Judgment seat of Christ, based not on fame but on faithfulness; not so much on what we did but on how we did what we did—and why

Conclusion:  James, son of Alphaeus, was not of the stature of Peter or John. But what if Christ had chosen 12 to be with Him and to preach the gospel of the kingdom—and every one of them had been like Peter or John?

A painter completed his work of the Last Supper and asked some friends to view it. One friend remarked on how beautiful the cups were from which the apostles were drinking. The artist took a brush and painted out the lovely cups, to the astonishment of his admiring friends. His reason: “I want people to see Jesus.”

That’s the way James, son of Alphaeus, was. When people saw him, they were reminded first of Jesus.

By the way, “Isn’t it strange that princes and kings, and clowns that caper in sawdust rings—and common folk like you and me are builders for eternity? To each is given a set of rules, a shapeless mass, and a bag of tools. And each must build ‘ere life has flown, a stumbling block or a stepping stone.”  (R.L. Sharpe)

Moreover, it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful.” (I Cor. 4:3)

I’d Rather Have Jesus

(Editor’s Note: Please take a few minutes to read the following testimony that my friend John B. Aker—a retired pastor and former military chaplain and educator—shared with me. You will surely be blessed and inspired, as I was.)

“Once in a very great while, someone is blessed, as perhaps you may have been, in meeting another on whom a scripture passage or promise seems to have alighted and become alive.  To know such a one, and to see a living illustration of some biblical truth, is truly inspiring…

In my life, I have been privileged to know a few such men.  My friend Bob, for whom some of you prayed during his operation and post-op recovery, is truly an example to me.  I have seen Bob up close and personal for more than fifteen years—and to me he pictures the kind of man of whom David once wrote, the kind of man I long to be:

Another man, whose name and ministry might be familiar–one whom I was privileged to know personally–truly personified a most special passage.  Canadian born,  George spent most of his adult life in The States.  During my tenure as vice-president of Trinity College/Trinity Evangelical Divinity School (now Trinity International University), George was a member of The Board.  At the suggestion of then President Harry Evans, George agreed to sing at some of our informational (another word for fund-raising) banquets at which I was the speaker.  And, George, who had traveled with one of the world’s most notable preachers, was ever and always encouraging, never condescending.

Decades earlier, while working for Mutual of New York in New York City, George lived in Cresskill, New Jersey at the home of Pastor Cronk (whose son Dr. Malcolm Cronk had been my advisor during my own student days at Trinity).  In 1933, a year before marrying his childhood sweetheart, George earned an audition with the famed Lyn Murray Singers. 

After his audition, and before learning its outcome, George returned to that little parsonage in Cresskill, but stopped first to pray in its small worship center.  He sat at the piano and quietly, prayerfully, composed the music to Rhea Miller’s now world-renowned I’d Rather Have Jesus.  He did not know as he brought that piece of music to life that he was also extinguishing his desire of ever singing before thousands.  As he played and sang these words, he renounced his own desire to sing on a worldly stage:

I’d rather have Jesus than silver or gold, I’d rather be His than have riches untold
I’d rather have Jesus than houses or land, I’d rather be led by His nail-pierced Hand

Than to be the king of a vast domain, And be held in sin’s dread sway
I’d rather have Jesus than anything This world affords today

I’d rather have Jesus than worldly applause, I’d rather be faithful to His dear cause,
I’d rather have Jesus than worldwide fame, Yes, I’d rather be true to His holy Name

Than to be the king of a vast domain, And be held in sin’s dread sway
I’d rather have Jesus than anything This world affords today.

When the call came early that evening, George declined their offer.  Little did George realize as he sat at the piano that God was in that chapel speaking to the young musician who, one day—and for many, many years—would sing before presidents, kings and queens, heads of states, and crowds of tens and tens of thousands simply because he purposed in his heart that

I’d rather have Jesus than worldly applause,  I’d rather be faithful to His dear cause,
I’d rather have Jesus than worldwide fame, Yes, I’d rather be true to His holy Name.

George was twenty four years old when he made that decision—and for almost eighty years after, George Beverly Shea would, before literally countless millions, tell The One Who spoke to him in that tiny church How Great Thou Art!

And so, in the late 1980’s, George was willing to sing while this unknown preacher spoke—and it never seemed to bother him.  I often wondered why?  Why was he willing to sing in little banquet halls in New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, and Iowa with an unknown young preacher…

I know now.  Do you?  It was more than his humility.  It was simply that no matter where, no matter how large or small the crowd or its applause—for George it was always about The Audience, and his Audience never changed.  He sang not for presidents, politicians, nor earthly rulers and royalty—George Beverly Shea sang only and always for an Audience of One…The King of Kings!

Oh, the verse.  I did not forget.  As I think of this great man, who now sings with angels and saints before our Father’s throne,  I see in him the personification of a verse that alighted on him and became alive in him, a pledge made by another man who also shared a platform before the kings and great men of his day–Daniel:

Daniel 1:8

What a testimony—faith in the flesh of Daniel…and George Beverly Shea!  Whatever verse you or I might choose to be our own, one which we would want other men to recall as they consider our lives, we must first be willing  to say and live, as did John The Baptizer:

John 3:30

To do that, we must be willing to never compromise…

Selah…and…Blessings!”

John 14:21

(Pastor Aker writes a weekly “Thought for the Week”—similar to what you have just read. To be included on his mailing list, contact him at jba@akerjba.com.)

Thomas, the Apostle (8th in a series on the Apostles)

Bad impressions can be difficult to shake. They sometimes follow you around like a stray dog you’d like to be rid of.

Sometimes they are even unfair, but that does not matter. They still persist. Remember Dan Quayle misspelling potato (or was it tomato?). Or, former president Gerald Ford hitting someone in the head with a golf ball, making Ford the butt of cartoonists who pictured him as wild and dangerous? Then there was Dick Cheney, who accidentally shot a hunting partner. And on and on.

Enter the apostle Thomas, aka Didymus, the twin. If I were to ask you to fill in the blank, what would you say: “Why worry, when you can pray; trust Jesus, He’ll be your stay. Don’t be a doubting ________, rest fully on His promise.” For more than two millennia, the apostle Thomas has been stuck with the moniker “Doubting Thomas.” He is often portrayed as melancholic, pessimistic, gloomy and skeptical.

But consider with me another view of Thomas—not the doubter but instead the leader, the learner, the leary, and the loved:

  1. Thomas, the Leader. When Jesus heard of the death of His friend, Lazarus, in Bethany, and waited four days before going to visit his sisters Mary and Martha, some of His disciples favored “letting well enough alone” in response to Jesus’s statement that Lazarus was sleeping (“howbeit Jesus spake of his death”) (John 11:12,13); others questioned the wisdom of Jesus going back into Judea, where He had not been welcomed (John 11:8). But it was Thomas who sided with Jesus, and with loyalty and courage said, “Let us also go that we may die with Him.” Some think these were the words of a despondent, despairing person; might they rather be the words of a totally, courageously committed follower of his Lord who was willing to face the possibility of being stoned to death with Jesus (John 11:8) if He were going to go to visit the grieving sisters of His friends. Jesus was developing committed, consistent, creative, courageous disciples. Maybe, just maybe, Thomas was displaying his courage—to go with Jesus in spite of personal danger—rather than to play it safe by staying where they were, even though Lazarus’s sisters had urged Jesus to come quickly when he had fallen gravely sick.
  2. Thomas, the Learner. In John 14, when Jesus told the apostles that He was going to prepare a place for them, then return at some future time to receive them to Himself, it was Thomas who said (in reply to Jesus’ statement that “And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know,”): “Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?” (John 14:4,5) But do not mistake an honest inquiry for doubt or disbelief. Thomas believed that Jesus was going to prepare a place; he desired to go with Jesus, and he was simply seeking more information. He had learned not to assume anything, nor to take anything for granted. If Jesus were going to prepare a place, Thomas wanted to be sure he was going to see Him again at that very place, and he wanted to get the directions down pat! No problem there! I often, even with GPS, need to ask someone to repeat the directions so as to be sure I can arrive at the desired destination!
  3. Thomas, the Leary. After His resurrection, Jesus appeared to the disciples in the Upper Room on the first day of the week. Thomas was not at that time present; but, having heard that he had missed seeing the resurrected Jesus, Thomas declared, “Except I shall see in His hands the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into His side, I will not believe.” (John 20:25) Eight days later, when Jesus appeared to His followers again, He bid Thomas to put his fingers into the nail prints and to thrust his hand into His side—and “be not faithless, but believing.” Thomas, like a disciple was supposed to be doing, was ever growing in his faith; the patient Teacher so often comes to us and proves beyond any doubt that He is sovereignly at work in our lives. Upon birth (as in the new birth) we are not suddenly full-grown in our faith, and we often find ourselves echoing the apostles’ plea, “Lord, increase our faith.” By the way, when Mary Magdalene first saw Jesus, and at His bidding went and told His disciples that He was alive and that she had seen Him, “they believed not.” And when the two men who had walked and talked with Jesus on the road to Emmaus told the disciples that they had seen Jesus risen and alive, “neither believed they them.” (Mark 16:11-13)
  4. Thomas, the Loved. Thomas was one of the seven disciples of whom we read in John 21 that Jesus prepared an early morning breakfast for, following His resurrection. Read the whole of this unique chapter and you will surely conclude that, like the other six seasoned fishermen-followers of the Lord Jesus, Thomas was included in a morning meeting with the risen Lord around a prepared fire, where fish had been fried and lovingly served by the Savior. This indicates that Thomas, too, had witnessed a miracle, enjoyed a meal, and heard a memorable message from the Lord as He patiently taught Peter about love and life, service and separation (death).

So, who’s going to condemn Thomas for being a doubter? He never denied Jesus. He followed Him when others were hesitant. He was bold enough to ask a question so as not to miss heaven. And he—like his compatriots, hearing that the crucified Savior had risen and had been seen—could not at first believe what seemed too good to be true. But seeing, he believed. And kneeling, he confessed: “My Lord, and my God!” Thomas had an evangelistic ministry in India and died a martyr’s death, tradition records, by being thrust through with a spear in 72 A.D.

So, be cautious about those first impressions. Thomas the Doubter? Or, Thomas the Leader, Thomas the Learner, Thomas the Leary, Thomas the Loved?

Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” (John 20:29)

Discipline—in the Local Church

A prominent evangelical leader—Al Mohler Jr., president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville—indicted today’s churches with the following alarming evaluation: “The decline of church discipline is perhaps the most visible failure of the contemporary church.”

When was the last time you remember a church exercising this scriptural mandate?
Discipline is never joyous at the time, whether when a parent must exercise discipline toward a disobedient child, or a teacher toward a student, or a civil authority upon a delinquent citizen, or—God forbid—a church upon a wayward saint who is a member of His Body, serving in and through a local body, a church.

  1. The precept of church discipline is based on scriptural injunctions. Old Testament Israelites, in covenant with their creator God, were given commandments regulating their diet, dress, and demeanor. To ignore these distinct directives was to jeopardize one’s standing as part of God’s family—and, in severe instances, even one’s life. In the New Testament economy, as God instructed His people about their walk and worship, the precept of discipline is inculcated into His Word. There are many examples of this, including Paul’s guidance to the church at Rome concerning those in that body who were causing “divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned…avoid them.” (Romans 16:17ff.)
  2. The purpose of discipline was for the good and spiritual well-being of the local assembly and for the spiritual reclaiming of the wayward worshipper. James put it this way: “If any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way, shall save a soul from death, and shall hide a multitude of sins.” (James 5:19,20) The death James alludes to in this passage is the sin unto death of which John spoke in his first epistle, where he mentioned that there is sin unto death (which a brother can sin) and sin not unto death.” (I John 5:16-18)
  3. The people of church discipline, then, are people living in open, flagrant sin that not only endangers their own well-being but puts in jeopardy the testimony and the validity of the whole body of believers. Paul wrote to the church at Corinth (I Cor. 5) reprimanding them because they had tolerated and ignored the fact that one of their members was living in immorality (the awfulness of which even unbelievers condemned); yet the church had become “puffed up” about the situation, rather than mournful about it, evidently “proud” of the exercise of the supposed “liberty” that they were embracing.
  1. The practice of church discipline, therefore, was established in epistles that apostles wrote, and also in the explicit teachings of our Lord Jesus Christ when teaching the apostles, who would become the foundation of the Church that He had promised He would build. (Matt. 16:18) In Matthew 18:15ff., Jesus sets forth clearly the steps in the practice of disciplining members of the local assembly who were walking disorderly.
  2. The pattern of church discipline can be observed in how Jesus told His followers to deal with a conflict between two estranged brothers. He told the offended brother to go to the offender and explain to him how he had been offended; if no resolution occurs through that meeting, he is go to a second time—this time with one or two members of the church accompanying him. Finally, if this meeting proves unfruitful in bringing about a resolution, he is to take the matter to the church (through proper channels, beginning with the pastor/elders). (Matt.18:15-18) The essence of this pattern or procedure was reiterated by Paul when he instructed the Corinthian church in how to deal with the member there who was living a life of reproach.
  3. The purity of the local assembly is at stake. Al Mohler, quoted above, went on to say: “The absence of church discipline is no longer remarkable—it is generally not even noticed. Regulative and restorative church discipline is, to many church members, no longer a meaningful category, or even a memory. The present generation of both ministers and church members is virtually without experience of biblical church discipline.” One might ask then: “Is today’s church known for its purity or for its tolerance of just about any aberrant behavior?”
  4. The peace that the practice of church discipline can afford is immeasurable in its benefits. Paul told the Galatians that if a brother was “overtaken” in a fault, one of the members in tune with God’s Spirit might, in meekness, when going to the brother, be used of God to restore the wayward member. (Gal. 6:1) Again, in his second letter to the Corinthian church, Paul intimates that the discipline that he had urged the church to exercise upon the fallen brother (I Cor. 5) had been successful in reaching its desired end; and now the brother, having repented, should be “forgiven…comforted… and confirmed” in love. (II Cor. 2:5-11)
  5. Finally, a word about the pitfalls of church discipline. When exhorting the Galatian church about restoring a brother who had been overtaken in fault, Paul instructed that someone who was “spiritual” should approach the brother “in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” (Gal. 6:1) The ever-lurking monster of pride must be guarded against as one of the common pitfalls prevalent in our watch-care of one another.

As a pastor for most of my adult life, it was the unhappy duty on a few occasions to lead our church in the exercise of Biblical, local-church discipline. Some produced the desired effect; some, sadly, did not. To all pastors, I would encourage you with these words: if people visit your church from another local assembly, be sure to make a courtesy call to the pastor of the church they have belonged to. That pastor might inform you that your visitors have been disciplined by the church they are leaving. You must honor that disciplinary action. Encourage them to return to their church and, if possible, resolve problems there biblically. This is not always done. One more word from Dr. Mohler: “The contemporary church sees itself as a voluntary association of autonomous members, with minimal moral accountability to God, much less to each other.” Selah.

Brethren, if any of you do err from the truth, and one convert him; let him know, that he which converteth the sinner from the error of his way, shall save a soul from death, and shall hide the multitude of sins.” (James 5:19,20)

Matthew, the Apostle (#7 in a series on the Apostles)

Before and after pictures are always fascinating to me.

You know—like the ones you see in the newspapers or magazines; or, more commonly now, on commercials for diets, plastic surgery, or hair replacement.

The Word of God gives us a striking picture of a “before and after” of an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ.

His name is Matthew, aka Levi, son of Alphaeus.

We have some insight into his life before and after his meeting with Jesus.

This study of God’s Word of this converted Jew will yield spiritual profit.

  1.  Matthew before he met Jesus.

➢ He, like all the apostles, was a Jew.

➢ He was familiar with the Old Testament, quoting from it more than any other gospel writer and citing passages from the Torah, the poetic books and the prophets.

➢ He was looking for the Messiah.

➢ He was also known as “Levi” (the house of the “priestly order,” set apart for worship).

➢ He was from Capernaum, located on the northern end of the Sea of Galilee, an important east-west trade town—visited by travelers from Mesopotamia; sheiks from desert oases, artisans from the east, and entrepreneurs from Rome. Roman roads made travel to and from there possible. When Jesus was rejected by Nazareth, He made His “base of operations” Capernaum, where He did much of His teaching and healing. (Mark 1:33,34)

➢ He was a tax-collector, a “publican,” employed by and for Rome.

  • These were known as “leeches.”
  • None were detested more by the Jews than tax collectors. A common saying among Jews: “Take not a wife out of that family wherein is a publican, for they are all thieves, robbers and harlots.”
  • They were cut off from family, friends, country, and the synagogue.
  • When publicans came to John the Baptist, asking him what they could do, he answered them, “Exact no more than that which is appointed you.” (Luke 3:12,13)
  1.  Matthew at the time he met Jesus, Matt. 9:9-13.

➢ Jesus met Matthew where he was (He found him!).

➢ Jesus gave him a simple command: “Follow me.”

  • He was not commanded or asked to quit anything.
  • He did not ask him to make any promises.
  • He did not lecture Matthew on the evils of what he was doing. “You don’t quit something and then believe; you believe and then quit.”
  • Matthew knew he needed Christ; he knew he couldn’t help himself; he knew what he was doing would never bring satisfaction; he repented—had a change of mind—and believing, followed Jesus.  
  1.  Matthew after he met Jesus.

➢ He was an obedient follower, Matt. 9:9.

➢ He was a dedicated follower, cf. Luke 5:28. (He left his job, his high paying position, but, thankfully he kept his pen!).

➢ Matthew, in his gospel, systematized the Sermon on the Mount; Jesus’ parables on the kingdom; and the teaching about the second coming of Christ. He gave us the genealogy of Jesus through Joseph.

➢He was an enthused follower of the Lord Jesus, Luke 5:29. In Mark 2:15ff. it says Matthew gave a dinner to Jesus, the disciples, and “publicans and sinners.” Three times “publicans and sinners” are mentioned as being present at the meal—they were, no doubt, the only friends Matthew had at that time.

➢ He was a faithful follower of Jesus, Matt. 10:3. He will receive that which Jesus promised in Matthew 19:29: “Everyone that hath forsaken houses or brethren or sisters or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name’s sake, shall receive an hundred fold, and shall inherit everlasting life.”

Despised as he once was by contemporary Jews, Matthew—by the grace, mercy, and love of God—will have his name inscribed on one of the twelve foundations of the New Jerusalem. (Rev. 21:14) Tradition records that he was burned at the stake. In his prominent place as a tax collector in Capernaum, he heard much of the miracles and of the messages of Jesus of Nazareth. On that day that Jesus stopped where Matthew was sitting at the receipt of custom, when Jesus simply said to this son of Alphaeus, “Follow Me,” Matthew “arose and followed Him,” and never looked back.

He was never one of the inner circle of His master; never was he out front or the first to speak up. But his mind never stopped rehearsing and recording what Jesus did and said; and, at the right time, Matthew took up his pen and wrote a book designed especially to appeal to his Jewish brethren in an attempt to once and for all prove to them that Jesus of Nazareth—by His birth, His life, and His death—fulfilled every Old Testament prophecy of this One who presented Himself as sent from God to those who sat in darkness and the shadow of death spoken of by the prophet Isaiah centuries before His coming—by the sea, beyond Jordan to Galilee of the Gentiles, to proclaim “Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” (Matt. 4:12-17)

And as He passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting at the receipt of custom, and said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed Him.” (Mark 2:14)

God’s Blueprint for Local Church Leadership

Evangelical churches are generally known by their desire to evangelize the unevangelized world; that is, to send missionaries into all the world with the gospel of Jesus Christ, in obedience to Christ’s command (Matt. 28:18-20). Then, when people who hear the gospel accept Christ, the missionary will endeavor to lead the convert into baptism, church membership, and then into a systematic discipleship program, grounding new believers in the doctrines taught in the Bible. All of this is done in the context of a local church ministry, as the church is the pillar and ground of the truth. (I Tim.3:15)

The goal of world mission endeavors originating in and mothered by a local church is the birthing of churches of like precious faith, churches that will in time—through teaching—become indigenous local assemblies; that is, bodies that are self-supporting, self-governing, and self-propagating. “To the uttermost part of the world” is the scope of this aggressive outreach that every local New Testament church has as its eventual goal. (Acts 1:8)

The part of “indigenous” that sometimes becomes a thorny issue—that of self-governing—has caused some unique challenges in the everyday, week after week, life of the local church.

Self-governing means that each local assembly, directed by the Holy Spirit through prayer and a consensus of the body, calls its own pastor, sends missionaries by action of the local church, and determines for itself what, when, and how the church, under the Headship and leadership of the Lord Jesus Christ, will conduct its worship and outreach without any directives from a “denominational” headquarters. Each local New Testament church, beginning with the first church in Jerusalem serving as a model (see Acts 15), governs its own affairs by Christ Jesus through the Spirit, led by an overseer—a bishop/pastor.

The earliest missions outreach, as set forth in Acts 13 and 14, was the result of the Holy Spirit directing the Antioch church to send forth two men whom the Spirit had set apart for service. These first missionaries were thrust out into missions ministries to start churches wherever people would accept Christ and gather together around Bible doctrine as taught by Paul and Barnabas in the earliest days of the Church. It should not be missed that, in many of these towns, Paul and his missionary companion not only led people to Christ but instituted Bible-doctrine classes, enrolling truth-thirsty new converts into a crash-course of New Testament teachings. Remarkably, in many of these cities, “elders—pastors” were “ordained” to lead the local flocks. That, at its core, was and is New Testament missions.

“Elders” were set apart, trained and left to be under shepherds of these baby churches. Later, in the epistles, Paul specified those who were delegated assignments in the church, and who were gifted by the Holy Spirit to execute their work responsibilities. (I Tim. 3) Peter, in his first epistle, addresses the elders as ones who were to “feed the flock” and to take the “oversight” thereof. These elders, pastors, bishops were called and equipped to do the work of the ministry, the bulk of which was to labor in the Word, teaching and preaching the whole counsel of God.

Early in the book of Acts, deacons were appointed, set apart in the local church, to “serve tables.” Qualifications for deacons were spiritual (I Tim. 3:8-14); there is no indication that they were to do anything but serve though. The work of a deacon was (is) to minister to the physical, temporal needs of those in the church who may, due to circumstances, find themselves in need of special assistance. Widows would be an example of those who, in some congregations, would need extra assistance in daily needs for food, shelter, watch care. There is not, in the New Testament, anything that would lend itself to the current, common mode of thinking that the duties of pastors and deacons are sometimes, somehow blended; and that deacons, if there is no pastor, can function as pastors. In extreme (yet not uncommon) instances, deacons sometimes feel that their “gift” to the church is that of assuming the duties of a pastor, that is, taking on pastoral responsibilities. This is unscriptural in any setting, in any church, whether the church has or does not have a pastor.

Pastors lead by the Spirit and at the direction of the Head, Jesus Christ; deacons serve as in “serving tables.” (Acts 6:1-5) The pastors give themselves over “continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the Word.” Too often, these Biblical roles are mingled. Pastors sometimes feel they need to “micromanage” every detail of the Body life; and, too often, deacons get the idea that their calling is tantamount to being an “assistant pastor.” This is not to say, though, that godly deacons cannot be an invaluable help to their pastor—by lifting his load of temporal cares, and by wise, thoughtful, and scriptural counsel.

The confusing and unscriptural mixing of ministries will cause dissension, division, and, if not corrected, the eventual death of what might have once been a great church. Any pastor who is blessed by the counsel, fellowship, prayers, and loyalty of a servant-deacon is a pastor whose ministry will flourish, as will the church that God has called him to lead.

No member, nor any visitor to any local church, should ever leave a service wondering, “Who’s in charge here?” Pastors, elders, and bishops are called and gifted to teach, preach, and lead the flock of God. Deacons are servers who do not have any “power,” either stated or implied. Happy and healthy is the local church that understands these distinctions in principle and in practice. Selah.

And He gave some…pastors and teachers for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ.” (Eph. 4:11,12)

Bartholomew (Nathanael) the Apostle (6th in a series on the Apostles)

The 12 men who uniquely lived and labored with Jesus of Nazareth for the duration of his 42-month public ministry are the subjects of this series on the Apostles.

They were holy men, yet not hallowed. They were good and godly men, yet men of passions and prejudices as men of today are.

They were convinced by and committed to the words and works of Jesus the Messiah.

They ultimately paid the supreme price for their faith and following of Jesus by dying a martyr’s death.

Of some of them, much us written; and of some, very little.

They were, for the most part, called one by one and sent out two by two.

They came from varying walks of life. And, though they possessed wide-ranging differences, one characteristic was common to all—they were to a man (with one exception) driven by devotion to Jesus Christ—a devotion that made them capable of any sacrifice.

They became the foundation of the Church that Jesus built and is building, Himself being the chief cornerstone.

Their messages and their ministries continue to touch lives world-wide today. When we study the Apostles, we learn not only of them but also of ourselves. We often see ourselves in them—their weaknesses are ours; their desires are ours, their faith and their frailties, most of us can easily identify with.

As we continue this study, our subject in this installment is a man introduced in John’s Gospel, chapter 1, verse 45:

  1. His Identity

► Nathanael, “gift of God.” He was from Cana in Galilee.
► Nathanael was his common name; Bartholomew was a patronym. He was a son of Tolmai. (Matt. 10:3; Mark 3:18; Luke 6:14, John 21:2)

  1. His Introduction

► He was sought and found by Philip, his friend, John 1:45. (Andrew found Peter; Jesus found Philip; Philip found Nathanael)
► He was a serious student of Scriptures, having read and studied the Law.
• Gen. 3:15: the “protoevangelium.”
• Gen. 49:10: “The sceptre shall not depart out of Judah….”
• Num. 24:17: “I shall see Him…I shall behold Him…a star out of Jacob….”
► He had studied the prophets and examined the Messianic prophecies
• Re: His virgin birth, 7:14; 9:6ff.
• Re: The time of His birth, Daniel 9:27
• Re: The place of His birth, Micah 5:2
• Re: The tribe from which He would come, Matt. 1:2ff.
►He was a sincere seeker, John 1:46-49
• Philip’s declaration indicates that they had been looking for the Messiah to come
• Nathanael’s question, v. 46, is out of sincerity not contempt. He was from Galilee himself, and Jews generally had a low view of Galilee. Common saying: “If any man would be rich, let him go to Galilee; if any would be wise, let him go to Jerusalem.”
• Nazareth was looked down upon because a Roman outpost was there; it was a notorious citadel of unbelief, Matt. 13:58.

  1. His Meeting with Jesus

► What Jesus said about Nathanael
• He was a true Israelite (John 1:47; cf. Romans 2:28)
• He was guileless, i.e. sincere, honest, transparent
• It was said also of Jesus, “Neither was any guile found in His mouth.” (I Pt.2:22)
(See Psalm 15 for a divine description of a guileless person)
► What Nathanael said to Jesus, John 1:48,49
• He called Him “Rabbi.”
• He said He was “the Son of God.”
• He acknowledged He was the King of Israel. His search was over, His quest was completed; His thirst was quenched!
► What Jesus Promised to Nathanael: “Greater things than these….”
• “Son of God,” v. 49—The rest of John’s Gospel would prove that in the “greater things” that are enumerated in his gospel (John 20:30,31)
• “Son of Man,” v. 51—Jesus reveals that He was also the Son of Man

  1. Things learned from studying Nathanael
    • As God knew Nathanael (before Nathanael met Jesus), so He knew each of us before we met Him.
    • With God, an interrogation can at once become a declaration:
    “Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?”; “Thou are the Son of God, Thou art the King of Israel.” (John 1:46,49)
    • Seeking faith will not be unrewarded, John 1:45.
    • Jesus can find you and will accept you where you are just now.

Nathanael answered and saith unto Him, Rabbi, Thou art the Son of God; Thou art the King of Israel.” (John 1:49)


One Invitation

Fifty-one years ago, Ed Christy graduated from Beech Grove High School in Beech Grove, Indiana. After graduation he found a job, and working alongside of him was a member of Thompson Road Baptist Church, at that time pastored by Dr. Fred Moritz.  One day, Dick Reed, Ed’s co-worker, invited Ed to attend services at TRBC (Thompson Road Baptist Church), and Ed responded by saying that he would one day.

Ed had attended a local mainline denominational church with his family all of his life. He was a “good person,” and had felt no need of any further religious experience.  But, remembering his promise one rather cold and snowy Sunday morning, Ed drove the short distance to the Baptist church.

It so happened that Pastor Moritz was sick on that particular Lord’s Day and the youth pastor was filling the pulpit. He preached, and while the message was going forth the Holy Spirit was doing His work in Ed Christy’s heart. He testifies that the message he heard that day was the first time he had ever heard the gospel plan of salvation. He had not had that personal experience, so when the invitation was extended, he responded by going forward to meet a personal worker, to whom he said, “I need to be saved.” And so he was. A layman knelt with him, explaining further the simple plan of salvation and encouraging him to by faith ask Jesus to forgive his sins and come into his heart. In a few moments, Ed Christy was gloriously saved. A short time later he was baptized by immersion and joined in membership to the local Baptist assembly, where for the first time ever he had heard the gospel proclaimed. But that is just the beginning.

In the course of time, Ed enrolled at Tennessee Temple University, graduating with a B.S. in Secondary Education. Then he graduated from San Francisco Baptist Theological Seminary with an M.Div. (Masters of Divinity), and finally from Bob Jones University with a Ph.D. in Old Testament. At BJU, Ed met Sylvia Carr, a graduate with a nursing degree who at the time was working on staff at the university hospital. Ed had sought the Lord’s will for a life’s partner earnestly, and year after year his friends had intensified their prayers that he would find God’s choice for him. Sylvia was a “jewel.” They have been married 39 years and have two grown children and three grandchildren, all living in France. Not by chance, Sylvia had wanted to travel with a Wilds Christian Camp team the summer that Ed met her, but her contract with the university mandated that she remain there for the duration of her commitment. So she “happened” to be there just at the time that she and her future husband would meet. God had that meeting planned and prepared in answer to the effectual, fervent prayers of His people!

When Dr. Christy was attending TTU, he was challenged in a conference for world missions. He learned from one of the speakers that France had 35,000 villages in which there was no witness for Christ. He listened carefully over time to that still, small voice of God’s Spirit speaking to his heart about taking the Good News to one or more of those villages in France. Sylvia shared that burden with her husband, so the Christys made plans to go to Europe as vocational missionaries. They were led of God to the southwestern city of Bordeaux, France, where God has used them to plant two New Testament churches in France during their 35 years of sowing, watering and reaping there.  

The work at times has been slow. When Covid-19 made its ugly appearance in France, like churches most everywhere, the in-person meetings were curtailed and “on-line” services were substituted. At the end of June, 2020, an attempt was made to resume on-site services, but the first such service had the Christys and one other person in attendance. So, back to the “virtual” services for a while longer. Not long after that, a young couple called to see if they could attend a service, and Ed said the services were on-line but that they could come to the place where he was transmitting the message if they wanted to.  They came and kept coming. They are now enrolled in the Bible Institute where Ed teaches, near Paris, and are preparing for ministry.

One Sunday morning after in-person services resumed, Ed arrived at the church site to open up and found two adolescents at the front door. When Ed asked if they were from the neighborhood they said “no,” and told him that their parents were coming. When the Dad and Mom arrived, four other children were with them, so their attendance that day swelled by eight! This family still attends, and the father has had some ministerial experience. They are, of course, a great blessing!

At present, the church is meeting in a restaurant. Buildings are hard to find and very expensive to rent. When Ed inquired about the restaurant as a meeting place, asking what the rent would be, the proprietor asked Ed what he would be willing to pay—something unheard of! The amount was agreed upon, and though not an ideal meeting place it has met a need. Now, however, with forty or fifty or more in attendance on some Sundays, it is becoming evident that a larger meeting place is an urgent need.

So, from six people on a Sunday in June of 2020, to forty or fifty people regularly in attendance, the Lord has built and blessed this church in Bordeaux. Missionary/pastor Ed Christy shakes his head and says it has really been “nothing we have done, but the Lord has just been bringing people to us.” If you are like me, you cannot help but think of that admonition in Gal. 6:9, where Paul wrote: “And let us not be weary in well doing; for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.

And it all began 51 years ago when one believer extended a simple invitation to his co-worker to attend a service at his church. Think of the rewards that person will receive at the judgment seat of Christ!

But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you: and ye shall be witnesses unto me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth.” (Acts 1:8)


MY SISTER MARY ANN

She is my oldest sister, born about eight years before I became the fourth of five children of Theodore and Margaret in Van Buren County, southeastern Iowa. Mary Ann was the first born, and she has always demonstrated an individualistic spirit. She is an avid reader, a loyal friend, a lover of fine china, a people-person, a devoted follower of the Lord Jesus Christ, a loving mother and grandmother, a leader by nature, and a consummate learner.

I could never begin to tell Mary Ann’s story; it so jam-packed full of life’s ventures and adventures. But I want to share a slice of it that might encourage someone reading this to “do right.”

When she graduated from high school in 1952, Mary Ann enrolled in Baptist Bible College of Springfield, MO. Arriving in Springfield, she had nothing and knew no one; but with her resourcefulness, she was able to quickly find a job, make a good friend, and meet teachers in this start-up Bible college who were willing to help her. That was the era when the likes of Jerry Falwell, Greg Dixon, and other notables from around the country were students in this Baptist Bible Fellowship college, and W.E. Dowell, David Cavin, G.B. Vick, Noel Smith, the Donnelsons, and other men and women of stature were leaders.

Mary Ann met and in 1954 would marry Tom Wilson, who attended BBC for a year before moving to Denver. He was from Seymour, Iowa, and from his childhood dreamed of flying planes in the United States Air Force; but having enlisted, he was later discharged honorably for medical reasons. In his life after the Air Force, Tom worked for Continental Air Lines, Douglas Aircraft, and other employers, learning also to become a skilled craftsman as a watchmaker. The Wilsons lived in Los Angeles, Denver, Charlotte, and finally in the greater Atlanta area. They enjoyed 56 years of married life until the Lord called Tom home, having battled Multiple Myeloma for about six years before being graduated to glory.

Four or five years into their marriage, Mary Ann was working at a Lincoln Mercury dealership, Kumpf Motor Car Company, in downtown Denver. An elderly gentleman came to her counter one day to pay his bill and pick up his car. She asked him for his ID not having met him before and not knowing that he was one of the wealthiest men in the United States at that time, having made a fortune as a cattleman with a ranch in Kansas. He was a bit put out at first that she would ask him for identification, but soon realized that this friendly young lady was pretty naïve and just doing her job. He pulled out a stuffed wallet and showed Mary Ann about every form of ID she could have imagined. She saw at the end of that string of Diner’s Club cards a picture of his grandchildren which she commented on. That was the beginning of an acquaintance and friendship that would continue while Tom and Mary Ann were in Denver.

In the course of time, the cattleman wanted to give Mary Ann a token of his appreciation for her friendship. He was going to be going on a trip, but before he left he thrust out a checkbook and asked her to write herself a check for any amount. He would never know how much it was. She was, of course, stunned. In no way had she ever thought of anything like that happening. She and Tom had been his guests at Denver’s most exclusive restaurant, and they had entertained him in their home. They desired opportunities to witness to him about Christ, and their motive was ever and only to be genuine friends to an old man who did not have close family as a part of his life. They did not realize, at that time, that he was indeed one of America’s wealthiest people. Mary Ann would not—could not—accept his generous offer, and as long as they were friends she never accepted any cash gifts from the Kansas cattleman.

I heard about that story and watched Mary Ann and Tom through the years. Mary Ann testified to her friend that she would always and only trust in the Lord to take care of her needs. Tom was a skilled craftsman and always had work. They lived in His presence, and their needs were always met. One could only guess what twists and turns life might have taken for the Wilsons, had they accepted this offer from a well-meaning friend. But Mary Ann has testified that it was never a temptation and that she was determined to trust God and depend on her husband to take care of her needs. And He has, to this day, never failed. From the time when, penniless, she enrolled in Baptist Bible College until this present hour, she has lived a comfortable life—not luxurious but surrounded by some of her very best friends, BOOKS, and living in a beautiful home on top of a Georgia mountain. She and Tom have always been active in a local Baptist Church wherever they have lived, and they have always been generous to others when there has been a need that they could help meet. When one of our sisters who lived in Waterloo, Iowa, struggled with serious health problems that eventually claimed her life, Mary Ann, in her mid-80s, drove to Waterloo alone from her home in Georgia to care for her multiple times over the course of Nancy’s last years. Nothing has ever seemed out of the realm of possibility for Mary Ann to tackle. Her spirit is indomitable.

With eight years separating us, I have not always known her closely; but I have admired her and loved her for her love of life, people, Christ and His Word, and for her steadfast testimony. When she was a high-school student, she wrote a paper for one of her classes on “Protestantism Versus Catholicism.” She received a failing grade from the teacher, and I almost got a heart attack out of it as I was in the Catholic hospital recovering from an appendectomy when she—armed with bound copies of her thesis—visited me in the hospital. As she was leaving, she left a copy of the little red booklet on Protestantism v. Catholicism between the fingers of all the statues of Mary. I had visions of being rolled down into the basement of that hospital, where something very grisly would happen to me. But, that was Mary Ann. And still pretty much is. An individualist. But on the right side and for the cause of truth. I am proud to call her my sister!

(This is a reprint of an earlier post about my sister as she is celebrating her 90th birthday this week. Drop her a note if you’d like at maw_keystone@yahoo.com. She would love to hear from you. Mention that you read this blog.)

“I thank my God upon every remembrance of you.” (Phil.1:3)


Eugene Satterfield

March 13, 1953 – February 16, 2025

This eulogy, read at Gene’s memorial service, is printed in “You and God” with permission from his wife, Miracle.

Gene Satterfield made a mark on every life he touched, for he could not, would not, be ignored. And, when he was on target spiritually and right with the Lord, he had something to say that one would do well to listen to.

I was privileged to know Gene the past 15 or 20 years—and to have been his pastor for most of that time. So I speak with a different insight into the man than most others would have.

I cannot, will not, paint him as some super saint, and if you knew him you would no doubt agree. But he was authentic. I did not know Gene in his earlier years, but he shared with me enough about those years that I know he fought some spiritual battles—with that old roaring lion, the Devil, and that old nature with which all of us daily deal—that too often left him with his back on the ropes. But, though he was down for the 9 count more times than he would have liked to remember, he always got back up—battered and bruised but not beaten. During much of that time, he survived by returning to God’s Word, memorizing it, meditating on it, and messaging it to whomever would give him an ear. He knew many key passages. He could recite verse after verse that was not only in his head but hidden in his heart.

Some years ago, when the Satterfields landed at Thompson Road Baptist Church, Gene attached himself to some men in the church who wanted to help him spiritually. They knew what he was going through; they could speak the language, and they could understand what Gene was all about. It might be more accurate to say that these men—led by Lonial Wire, a long-time member and song leader at our church, who had fought some of the same battles—attached themselves to Gene. They met with him every week, usually before prayer meeting on Wednesday nights, prayed with him, encouraged him, listened to him, and held him accountable. And, it worked! During those years, Gene was a vocal, visible witness for his Lord and Savior. He was at times a one-man “Amen corner” at TRBC during the preaching hour. Sometimes, others joined him in a chorus of amens, which was just like saying “sic ‘em” to this preacher. And, it was not just during the preaching—it was before and after. His countenance shown with the joy of the Lord; he loved God’s Word; his prayers were like those one could imagine hearing in an old-fashioned revival meeting.

But, more important than any other person (other than Gene’s Lord and Savior) was his devoted wife, Miracle (named so by her mother at birth because she was not supposed to have made it into this world intact—but, by God’s grace, she did!). I added the word “woman” and called her “Miracle Woman,” which she earned if for no other reason than that she was a steadying and steadfast stalwart beside Gene every day that he wobbled or wandered. Miracle was the glue that held the Satterfield family together. He would not have made it without her patient and unwavering support.

Gene joined a Tuesday-morning book-study group that 10 or 12 men have been attending for a dozen or so years. His comments were always relevant. He was direct, plugged in, energized, and always a welcome addition to any of the meetings that he was able to attend. We never could convince Gene, though, that when he gave himself an insulin shot before eating the donut in front of him at our early morning meetings, it would be better if he would not stick the needle through his shirt or jacket—as he would invariably do—rather than rolling up a sleeve for the injection!

So, this sometimes not-so-saintly saint—never one to drop out and fall by the wayside—was one of a kind. He is one that this pastor can never forget and will always be grateful to God for allowing our church to be challenged by, here on the corner of State and Thompson Road. He was ever a presence in any assembly. He was bold, blunt, and when he was right with His Lord, biblical. He spoke the truth, not with an air of superiority but with humility—as one who had not yet attained but was determined to ever keep on keeping on.

What Jesus ended His letter with to the church in Smyrna—when He sent messages to the seven churches that are recorded in the Revelation—I think appropriately concludes my remarks about my beloved brother and dear friend, Gene Satterfield:

He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the hidden manna, and will give him a white stone, and in the stone a new name written, which no man knoweth saving he that receiveth it.” (Rev. 2:18)

Gene is an overcomer finally, fully, and forever. “For whosoever is born of God overcometh the world; and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?” (I John 5:4,5)

Gene would qualify for the white stone and new name. How about you? Will you join him in the victor’s circle?
 

Pastor Anthony Slutz

February 21, 2025